The Geography of Thought – Richard Nisbett (2003)

The Geography of Thought

I found this book among the remainders the other day, and I’m glad I picked it up. It’s an exploration of the differing perspectives and thought processes between the ‘West’ and the ‘East’ (actually looking at data for Americans, Europeans, and East Asians). It’s an easy read, but seems grounded in real science, referring to multiple studies that point out these differences.

Very broadly, in the West people are more ‘object-oriented’; they identify objects, think about the properties of the object, and think of objects essentially as stand-alone (objects certainly includes people as well). In the East there’s apparently much more tendency to see ‘the field’; a set of related things in a certain context, where the individual objects have less distinct identity and more context-dependent behavior. These distinctive ways of seeing the world apparently start at a very early age.

I find such work very interesting, because it can help you identify some of your own cognitive biases, and just may help you to understand other ways of seeing the world.

Here’s a lengthy review that provides more details on the book.

Update: A few more interesting distinctions (note that these are all simply tendencies that are not followed by all members of the group, and through priming can be encouraged or discouraged):

Westerners: tendency to categorize, use either/or, right/wrong distinctions, and think of objects as having static properties (thus less likely to predict change).

Asians: tendency to focus on context and relationships, social importance on harmonious relations, less debate and rhetoric, more comfort with contradiction and complexity, more likely to see change as possible due to shifting contexts.

Nisbett also notes some interesting differences in culture that seem to flow from these different ways of seeing things; for instance, the preponderance of lawyers in the West vs. the East, the notion of holistic medicine in the East, the lack of scientific breakthroughs from the East.

Advertisements
Trackbacks are closed, but you can post a comment.

Comments

  • Kamaratih  On December 6, 2007 at 4:16 pm

    I am a coordinated bilingual Asian and have been spending seven years studying in a Western country. I have followed up the lengthy review. It is very interesting to notice that after writing the book, Nisbett arrived to a very Asian way of thinking (in the lengthy review: “a convergence of Eastern and Western styles that enhances and transforms the best of both cultures”).

    But maybe a harmonious conclusion is not so surprising. While the scientific breakthrough might be metaphorically an in vitro situation where variables are more under control, life is more an in vivo experiment where there are so many variables that is ‘uncontrollable’. So complex and harmonious solutions might be the way….

    Anyway, we could see now how the risk of climate change is shared by all nations of the world. In contrast with the fact that the exploitation of the natural resources of the world (contributed to the climate change) is not shared by all ;)))))))))))))))

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: